Law and Philosophy 13 (4):451 - 479 (1994)
|Abstract||What can a philosophical analysis of the concept of interpretation contribute to legal theory? In his recent book,Interpretation and Legal Theory, Andrei Marmor proposes a complex and ambitious analysis as groundwork for his positivist assault on “interpretive” theories of law and of language. I argue (i) that the crucial element in Marmor's analysis of interpretation is his treatment of Ludwig Wittgenstein's remarks on following rules, and (ii) that a less ambitious analysis of interpretation than Marmor's can take better advantage of those insights about rules. I explore some implications of such an analysis for the role of interpretation in legal reasoning.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paulo Oliva (2008). An Analysis of Gödel's Dialectica Interpretation Via Linear Logic. Dialectica 62 (2):269–290.
Andrei Marmor (2001). Positive Law and Objective Values. Clarendon Press.
Joseph Raz (2009). Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
William H. Wilcox (1997). Book Review:Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Andrei Marmor. [REVIEW] Ethics 107 (4):740-.
Andrei Marmor (1991). Coherence, Holism, and Interpretation: The Epistemic Foundations of Dworkin's Legal Theory. Law and Philosophy 10 (4):383 - 412.
Andrei Marmor & Scott Soames (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law. Oxford University Press, Usa.
Neil MacCormick (1994). Book Review:Interpretation and Legal Theory. Andrei Marmor. [REVIEW] Ethics 105 (1):195-.
David T. Ritchie (2008). Mastering Legal Analysis and Communication. Carolina Academic Press.
Andrei Marmor (ed.) (1995). Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #70,994 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?