Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):101-22 (1996)
|Abstract||I critically examine some provocative arguments that John Searle presents in his book The Rediscovery of Mind to support the claim that the syntactic states of a classical computational system are "observer relative" or "mind dependent" or otherwise less than fully and objectively real. I begin by explaining how this claim differs from Searle's earlier and more well-known claim that the physical states of a machine, including the syntactic states, are insufficient to determine its semantics. In contrast, his more recent claim concerns the syntax, in particular, whether a machine actually has symbols to underlie its semantics. I then present and respond to a number of arguments that Searle offers to support this claim, including whether machine symbols are observer relative because the assignment of syntax is arbitrary, or linked to universal realizability, or linked to the sub-personal interpretive acts of a homunculus, or linked to a person's consciousness. I conclude that a realist about the computational model need not be troubled by such arguments. Their key premises need further support.|
|Keywords||Mind Syntax Searle, J observer relativity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Neal Jahren (1990). Can Semantics Be Syntactic? Synthese 82 (3):309-28.
Andrew Melnyk (1996). Searle's Abstract Argument Against Strong AI. Synthese 108 (3):391-419.
Jürgen Schröder (1991). Searles Kritik Am Funktionalismus — Eine Untersuchung Des Chinesischzimmers. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (2):321-336.
Richard Double (1983). Searle, Programs and Functionalism. Nature and System 5 (March-June):107-14.
William J. Rapaport (1986). Searle's Experiments with Thought. Philosophy of Science 53 (June):271-9.
Evan Thompson (1997). Symbol Grounding: A Bridge From Artiﬁcial Life to Artiﬁcial Intelligence. Brain and Cognition 34 (1):48-71.
John Haugeland (2003). Syntax, Semantics, Physics. In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Dale Jacquette (1990). Fear and Loathing (and Other Intentional States) in Searle's Chinese Room. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):287-304.
John R. Searle, Barry Smith, Leo Zaibert & Josef Moural (2001). Rationality in Action: A Symposium. Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66 – 94.
John R. Searle (1990). Is the Brain a Digital Computer? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64 (November):21-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #17,761 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,336 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?