A revised category mistake argument
Philosophical Studies 23 (6):421 - 423 (1972)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFarhang Zabeeh (1962). Category-Mistake. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (2):277-278.
Philip Bashor & Arifa Farid (1987). Deliberate Commission of Category Mistake. Crombie Vs. Ryle. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (1):39 - 46.
Charles M. Myers (1962). Perceptual Events, States, and Processes. Philosophy of Science 29 (July):285-291.
Andrew Gleeson (2005). Pettit on Consequentialism and Universalizability. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3):261-275.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2008). The Irrelevance of the Consequence Argument. Analysis 68 (297):13–22.
Edward Erwin (1968). Farewell to the Category Mistake Argument. Philosophical Studies 19 (5):65 - 71.
Albert Hofstadter (1951). Professor Ryle's Category-Mistake. Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):257-269.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
