Beyond the Best Interests of Children: Four Views of the Family and of Foundational Disagreements Regarding Pediatric Decision Making
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):499-517 (2010)
|Abstract||This paper presents four different understandings of the family and their concomitant views of the authority of the family in pediatric medical decision making. These different views are grounded in robustly developed, and conflicting, worldviews supported by disparate basic premises about the nature of morality. The traditional worldviews are often found within religious communities that embrace foundational metaphysical premises at odds with the commitments of the liberal account of the family dominant in the secular culture of the West. These disputes are substantial and ultimately irresolvable by sound rational argument because of the failure to share common foundational premises and rules of evidence. It is in light of these fundamental disagreements that there is a need to evaluate critically the claims and agenda advanced by the Convention on the Rights of the Child|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. J. Cherry (2010). Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
A. S. Iltis (2010). Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.
B. C. Partridge (2010). Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):518-525.
C. Delkeskamp-Hayes (2011). Resolving Family Disagreements in Biomedical Decision Making: The Spiritual Source of Paternal Authority. Christian Bioethics 17 (3):206-226.
Ruiping Fan (2002). Reconsidering Surrogate Decision Making: Aristotelianism and Confucianism on Ideal Human Relations. Philosophy East and West 52 (3):346-372.
Ferdinand Schoeman (1985). Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Jessica Masty & Celia Fisher (2008). A Goodness-of-Fit Approach to Informed Consent for Pediatric Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):139 – 160.
Howard Kunin (1997). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Life-Threatening Illness: Dilemmas of Consent, Assent, and Communication. Ethics and Behavior 7 (1):43 – 57.
Dallas M. High & Howard B. Turner (1987). Surrogate Decision-Making: The Elderly's Familial Expectations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
Barry Hoffmaster & Wayne Weston (1987). The Patient in the Family and the Family in the Patient. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).
H. U. I. Edwin (2008). Parental Refusal of Life-Saving Treatments for Adolescents: Chinese Familism in Medical Decision-Making Re-Visited. Bioethics 22 (5):286–295.
Claudia Wiesemann (2010). The Moral Challenge of Natality: Towards a Post-Traditional Concept of Family and Privacy in Reprogenetics. The New Genetics and Society 29:61-71.
Lisa Webley, Divorce Solicitors and Ethical Approaches - the Best Interests of the Client and/or the Best Interests of the Family?
Eugene V. Boisaubin, Adeline Chu & Janine M. Catalano (2007). Perceptions of Long-Term Care, Autonomy, and Dignity, by Residents, Family and Care-Givers: The Houston Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):447 – 464.
Added to index2010-10-06
Total downloads11 ( #107,531 of 738,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?