Capital as a Social Kind: Definitions and Transformations in the Critique of Political Economy
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Capital as a Social Kind provides an introduction to social kinds in social theory. Thinking about kinds, the way we sort the things of the world into categories -- water, for example, is a natural kind – has made an important contribution to our understanding of science in the last half century, but these advances have been largely applicable to the natural, rather than the social sciences. Drawing on the rich examples offered by Marx’s analysis of capital and exploring a methodology that will be of interest to both Marxist and non-Marxist social theorists alike, Capital as a Social Kind extends this approach to the study of social life. The book argues that, provoked by his study of Aristotle, Marx’s attentions foreshadowed contemporary themes in the realist philosophy of science. Importantly, social kind analysis is relevant not only to understanding his critique of political economy but illuminates also a materialist study of law, justice, morality and the transition to socialism. Social kind analysis also opens a path for the development of today’s moral realism by suggesting the need for a systematic study of the causal structures of social life. In this respect the importance of normative themes in Marxism is defended against claims that the Marxist tradition lacks the resources to call capitalism unjust or to defend morality and human rights. The origin of capital, Marx suggests, can be found in the rupture of an original unity between the laborer and the means of labor, and the book explores the way a structure of separations best characterizes capital as a social kind. This uncovers a little developed emphasis in Marx’s work – his focus on the phenomena of separation that define our lives and also on forms of association required to transcend them. Given that capitalism has made the instruments of labor instruments of social labor, forms of association that would recover worker control over them must be democratic. The transition to socialism, the book concludes, just is winning the battle of democracy. This book will be of interest to students and researchers of economics, philosophy and indeed any social science subject.|
|Keywords||marxism philosophy of science moral and legal theory social and political theory the transition to socialism political economy of capital|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$97.00 used (31% off) $117.60 new (16% off) $133.00 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ben Fine (2001). Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. Routledge.
Patricia M. L. Illingworth (2011). Us Before Me: Ethics and Social Capital for Global Well-Being. Palgrave Macmillan.
James Farr (2004). Social Capital: A Conceptual History. Political Theory 32 (1):6-33.
Howard Engelskirchen (2007). Realism About Causality in Social Science. Sociology's Causal Confusion / Douglas Porpora; the Mother of All Isms: Causal Mechanisms in Political Science / Andrew Bennett; Marxisn Crisis Theory and Causality / Robert Albritton; on the Clear Comprehension of Political Economy: Social Kinds and the Significance of Marx's Capital. In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.
Mikael Rostila (2011). The Facets of Social Capital. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):308-326.
Howard Engelskirchen (2008). On the Clear Comprehension of Political Economy : Social Kinds and the Significance of Section 2 of Marx's Capital. In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.
Paul Burkett (2004). On Ben Fine's Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. Historical Materialism 12 (1):233-246.
Haifeng Yang (2006). Critique of Metaphysics, Capital Logic and Totality, and Social Critique Theory: The Three Critical Dimensions of Marx's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):269-278.
Costas Panayotakis (2004). A Marxist Critique of Marx's Theory of History: Beyond the Dichotomy Between Scientific and Critical Marxism. Sociological Theory 22 (1):123-139.
Daniel Little (1986). Historical Materialism and Capital. Topoi 5 (2):187-196.
Murray E. G. Smith (1993). Productivity, Valorization and Crisis: Socially Necessary Unproductive Labor in Contemporary Capitalism. Science and Society 57 (3):262 - 293.
Joanne Savage & Satoshi Kanazawa (2004). Social Capital and the Human Psyche: Why is Social Life "Capital"? Sociological Theory 22 (3):504-524.
Bradford Verter (2003). Spiritual Capital: Theorizing Religion with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu. Sociological Theory 21 (2):150-174.
Paul Burkett (1996). Value, Capital and Nature: Some Ecological Implications of Marx's Critique of Political Economy. Science and Society 60 (3):332 - 359.
Jordi Mundós (2008). The Political Economy of the Household. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:87-95.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-04-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?