Classical Analogs of Unitarily Equivalent Hamilton Operators

Foundations of Physics 28 (3):375-384 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A unitary transformation replaces the given description of a quantum system by an equivalent one. It is observed, however, that not all members of a set of unitarily equivalent Hamilton operators are equally well suited for identifying the corresponding classical systems. A criterion is proposed for recognizing the privileged representatives of the set. A few explicit examples are reported that show the criterion at work.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why the Hamilton Operator Alone Is not Enough.I. Schmelzer - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (5):486-498.
Mixed logic and storage operators.Karim Nour - 2000 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (4):261-280.
The Leibniz project.David Finkelstein - 1977 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):425 - 439.
Substitution and truth in quantum logic.Itamar Pitowsky - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):380-401.
Equivalent Lagrangians in classical field theory.Sergio Hojman & L. C. Shepley - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (5):465-481.
The Hamiltonian Syllogistic.Ian Pratt-Hartmann - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):445-474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#616,937)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references