Doubts about the objectivity of ontology

Abstract

Hard direction, e.g.: Universalese to Organicese. Suggestion: ‘Some chairs wobble’ should become something like ‘If composition were universal, some chairs wobble’ or ‘Assuming that composition is universal, some chairs wobble’ or ‘According to the fiction that composition is universal, some chairs wobble’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

How to have a radically minimal ontology.Ross P. Cameron - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (2):249 - 264.
The Anatomy of the Image: Toward an Applied Onto-Psychiatry.James M. Fielding & Dirk Marwede - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (4):287-303.
Brutal Composition.Ned Markosian - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211 - 249.
Non-arbitrariness of composition and particularism.Matjaž Potrč - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):197-215.
A Taxonomy of Composition Operations.Jan Westerhoff - 2004 - Logique and Analyse 2004 (47):375-393.
Ordinary Objects.Amie L. Thomasson (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truth and objectivity.Brian David Ellis - 1990 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Ontology and objectivity.Thomas Hofweber - 1999 - Dissertation, Stanford University
What are we?: a study in personal ontology.Eric T. Olson - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references