Fair Equality of Opportunity Critically Reexamined: The Family and the Sustainability of Health Care Systems
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):583-602 (2012)
|Abstract||A complex interaction of ideological, financial, social, and moral factors makes the financial sustainability of health care systems a challenge across the world. One difficulty is that some of the moral commitments of some health care systems collide with reality. In particular, commitments to equality in access to health care and to fair equality of opportunity undergird an unachievable promise, namely, to provide all with the best of basic health care. In addition, commitments to fair equality of opportunity are in tension with the existence of families, because families are aimed at advantaging their own members in preference to others. Because the social-democratic state is committed to fair equality of opportunity, it offers a web of publicly funded entitlements that make it easier for persons to exit the family and to have children outside of marriage. In the United States, in 2008, 41% of children were born outside of wedlock, whereas, in 1940, the percentage was only 3.8%, and in 1960, 5%, with the further consequence that the social and financial capital generated through families, which aids in supporting health care in families, is diminished. In order to explore the challenge of creating a sustainable health care system that also supports the traditional family, the claims made for fair equality of opportunity in health care are critically reconsidered. This is done by engaging the expository device of John Rawls’s original position, but with a thin theory of the good that is substantively different from that of Rawls, one that supports a health care system built around significant copayments, financial counseling, and compulsory savings, with a special focus on enhancing the financial and social capital of the family. This radical recasting of Rawls, which draws inspiration from Singapore, is undertaken as a heuristic to aid in articulating an approach to health care allocation that can lead past the difficulties of social-democratic policy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
John C. Moskop (1983). Rawlsian Justice and a Human Right to Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):329-338.
Lawrence Stern (1983). Opportunity and Health Care: Criticisms and Suggestions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):339-361.
Dani Filc (2007). The Liberal Grounding of the Right to Health Care: An Egalitarian Critique. Theoria 54 (112):51-72.
Azam Golam (2010). Distribution of Health Care Resources in LIC: A Utilitarian Approach. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Shlomi Segall (2010). Is Health (Really) Special? Health Policy Between Rawlsian and Luck Egalitarian Justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):344-358.
M. J. Cherry (2012). Building Social and Economic Capital: The Family and Medical Savings Accounts. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (6):526-544.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2001). On Duties to Provide Basic Health and Dental Care to Children. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):193 – 209.
Norman Daniels (1985). Just Health Care. Cambridge University Press.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Paul T. Menzel (1992). Equality, Autonomy, and Efficiency: What Health Care System Should We Have? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):33-57.
Loretta M. Kopelman (1996). Ethical Assumptions and Ambiguities in the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):187-208.
Y. Cao, X. Chen & R. Fan (2011). Toward a Confucian Family-Oriented Health Care System for the Future of China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):452-465.
Rui Nunes & Guilhermina Rego (forthcoming). Priority Setting in Health Care: A Complementary Approach. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis:1-12.
Erich H. Loewy (1999). Health-Care Systems and Ethics: What Can We Learn? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (4):309-320.
Paul T. Menzel (2003). How Compatible Are Liberty and Equality in Structuring a Health Care System? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):281 – 306.
Added to index2012-12-01
Total downloads2 ( #247,893 of 753,568 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,265 of 753,568 )
How can I increase my downloads?