Graduate studies at Western
Inquiry 23 (2):157 – 172 (1980)
|Abstract||In discussing Elster's views on the use of counterfactuals and on the nature of contradictions in society, it is contended that, in general, these will not seem especially controversial to those trained in neoclassical economics. Similarly, there is little disagreement in principle between the views of many 'new economic historians' and Elster on the use of counterfactuals in the study of historical problems. In evaluating Elster's critique of several applications of counterfactuals in the 'new economic history', it is argued that the concentration on broad philosophical questions may obscure the point that much recent controversy is based upon disagreements concerning factual issues and the nature of empirical relationships and magnitudes.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jens Harbecke (2011). Mind in a Humean World. Metaphysica 12 (2):213-229.
Stephen Barker (2011). Can Counterfactuals Really Be About Possible Worlds? Noûs 45 (3):557-576.
Ruth E. Kastner (2003). The Nature of the Controversy Over Time‐Symmetric Quantum Counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):145-163.
John Hawthorne (2005). Chance and Counterfactuals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):396–405.
S. Barker (1999). Counterfactuals, Probabilistic Counterfactuals and Causation. Mind 108 (431):427-469.
William Hasker (1999). A New Anti-Molinist Argument. Religious Studies 35 (3):291-297.
Steven Lukes (1980). Ii. Elster on Counterfactuals. Inquiry 23 (2):145 – 155.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads8 ( #131,939 of 740,478 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,478 )
How can I increase my downloads?