Political education in/as the practice of freedom: A paradoxical defence from the perspective of Michael Oakeshott
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (3):325–349 (2007)
Creating education systems that promote democratic sustainability has been the concern of political thinkers as diverse as J. S. Mill, Dewey, Benjamin Barber and Derek Bok. The classic dichotomisation of democratic theory between deliberative democrats and Schumpeterian democrats suggests that education in the service of democracy can be constructive—that is, provide a student with the skills necessary to elect her leaders without changing her nature—or reconstructive—that is, fundamentally and radically reshape the student to produce a citizen whose goals are transformed to be congruent with society. Michael Oakeshott, who has written extensively both on political regimes and on the purpose of liberal education, offers a third way to assess the connection between government and education. Despite his own dismissal of civic or political education as fundamentally vocational and thus beyond the boundaries of the liberal arts, this paper provides a potentially surprising Oakeshottian defence of political education within the liberal arts with reference to the importance he places on experience as a pedagogic tool. Thus, Oakeshott's educational philosophy has a certain resonance with the recent calls to locate the relevance of liberal arts within the burgeoning development of experiential civic engagement programmes in American universities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Williams (2009). Vision and Elusiveness in Philosophy of Education: R. S. Peters on the Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):223-240.
Vanessa Scholes (2013). Must a Developed Democratic State Fully Resource Any Tertiary Education for its Citizens? Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-15.
Kenneth B. Mcintyre (2012). Liberal Education and the Teleological Question; or Why Should a Dentist Read Chaucer? Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):341-363.
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth Corey (2009). Religion and the Mode of Practice in Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):139-151.
Paul Franco (2003). Oakeshott, Berlin, and Liberalism. Political Theory 31 (4):484-507.
Leslie Marsh (2004). Review of Efraim Podoksik: In Defence of Modernity: Vision and Philosophy in Michael Oakeshott. [REVIEW] Political Studies Review 2 (3):337-338.
Michael Oakeshott (1989). The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education. Yale University Press.
Steven Anthony Gerencser (2000). The Skeptic's Oakeshott. St. Martin's Press.
Leslie Marsh (2010). Ryle and Oakeshott on the “Knowing-How/Knowing-That” Distinction. In Corey Abel (ed.), The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Conservatism.
Ian Frowe (2007). 'The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism': Michael Oakeshott, Education and Extremism. British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (3):264 - 285.
Kevin Williams (1989). The Dilemma of Michael Oakeshott: Oakeshott's Treatment of Equality of Opportunity in Education and His Political Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy of Education 23 (2):223–240.
Leslie Marsh (2005). Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott. In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
Mark T. Mitchell (2001). Michael Polanyi and Michael Oakeshott. Tradition and Discovery 28 (2):23-34.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #209,479 of 1,410,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?