The ordination of bioethicists as secular moral experts
Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):59-82 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMark P. Aulisio (1998). The Foundations of Bioethics: Contingency and Relevance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (4):428 – 438.
Hallvard Lillehammer (2004). Who Needs Bioethicists? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (1):131-144.
Patrick G. T. Healey (2004). Dialogue in the Degenerate Case? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-201.
Carolyn A. Laabs (2008). The Community of Nursing: Moral Friends, Moral Strangers, Moral Family. Nursing Philosophy 9 (4):225-232.
Michael Cholbi (2007). Moral Expertise and the Credentials Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):323-334.
Chris MacDonald (2003). Will the "Secular Priests" of Bioethics Work Among the Sinners? American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):36-39.
Louis E. Newman (1993). Talking Ethics with Strangers: A View From Jewish Tradition. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):549-567.
David Archard (2011). Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts. Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Bernward Gesang (2010). Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts? Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
H. T. Engelhardt (2011). Confronting Moral Pluralism in Posttraditional Western Societies: Bioethics Critically Reassessed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):243-260.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads19 ( #64,338 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
