Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (3):359-380 (1994)
|Abstract||The common assumption that the Transcendental Deduction aims to refute scepticism often leads interpreters to conclude that it fails and even that Kant is confused about what it is supposed to achieve. By examining what Kant himself says concerning the Deductions' relation to scepticism, this article seeks to determine what sort of scepticism he has in view and how he responds to it. It concludes that the Deduction aims neither to refute Cartesian, outer- world scepticism nor to refute Humean, empiricist scepticism, and it outlines an alternative conception of the Deduction's task, as one of reconciling apparently conflicting claims of reason|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Markku Leppäkoski (1993). The Transcendental How: Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Objective Cognition. Almqvist & Wiksell.
Ralf M. Bader (2012). The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
Corey W. Dyck (2011). Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
Anthony L. Brueckner (1983). Transcendental Arguments I. Noûs 17 (4):551-575.
Robert Hanna (2011). Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Robert Stern (2008). Kant's Response to Skepticism. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
J. L. Martin (1974). Strawson's Transcendental Deduction of Other Minds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Suppl.) 159:159-169.
Anil Gomes (2010). Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose? Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2010). “Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: An Essay on the Philosophical Resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic”. Kantian Review 14 (2):1-37.
Michael Barker (2001). The Proof Structure of Kant's a-Deduction. Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #9,100 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,339 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?