Reason and revelation: Kant and the problem of authority [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):103 - 114 (2007)
This paper explores the significance of authority for Kant’s understanding of the relationship between reason and revelation. Beginning with the separation of the faculties of Theology and Philosophy in Conflict, it will be shown that Kant sees a clear distinction between the authority of reason and that of revelation. However, when one turns to Religion, it is also clear that Kant sees an important, perhaps necessary, relationship between the two. Drawing on a variety of texts, in particular those concerning the public and private use of reason, this paper then explores the relationship between the authority of reason and that of revelation. From this discussion, several conclusions will be drawn regarding Kant’s understanding of the relationship between reason and revelation, namely that while distinct, the two are not necessarily in conflict and that, ultimately, the proper functioning of public reason must include some reference to revelation.
|Keywords||Kant Reason Revelation Authority Public Private Hope|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Immanuel Kant (1996). Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant (1979/1992). The Conflict of the Faculties =. University of Nebraska Press.
Allen W. Wood (1970). Kant's Moral Religion. Ithaca,Cornell University Press.
Onora O'Neill (1986). The Public Use of Reason. Political Theory 14 (4):523-551.
Chris L. Firestone & Stephen R. Palmquist (eds.) (2006). Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Indiana University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ed L. Miller (1970). Classical Statements on Faith and Reason. New York,Random House.
Steven Frankel (2005). Spinoza's Response to Maimonides. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):309-325.
Kelli S. O'Brien (2000). Kant and Swinburne on Revelation. Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):535-557.
Alex Englander (2011). Kant's Aesthetic Theology: Revelation as Symbolisation in the Critical Philosophy. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (3):303-317.
Balázs M. Mezei (2006). Divine Revelation and Human Person. Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
Bina Gupta (2005). The Place of Reason in Advaita Vedānta. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):293-307.
Susan Neiman (1994). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford University Press.
C. Stephen Evans (2000). Kierkegaard on Religious Authority. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):48-67.
John Paul (ed.) (1999/1998). Encyclical Letter, Fides Et Ratio, of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul Ii: To the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason. United States Catholic Conference.
Joseph G. Trabbic (2002). Aquinas and Continental Philosophy of Religion. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:211-228.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #74,438 of 1,725,565 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,565 )
How can I increase my downloads?