Epistemicism and nihilism about vagueness: What's the difference?

Philosophical Studies 133 (2):285 - 311 (2007)
Abstract
In this paper I argue, first, that the only difference between Epistemicism and Nihilism about vagueness is semantic rather than ontological, and second, that once it is clear what the difference between these views is, Nihilism is a much more plausible view of vagueness than Epistemicism. Given the current popularity of certain epistemicist views (most notably, Williamson’s), this result is, I think, of interest.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,747
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
James Cargile (1969). The Sorites Paradox. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):193-202.

View all 22 references

Citations of this work BETA
Hanoch Ben-Yami (2010). A Wittgensteinian Solution to the Sorites. Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):229-244.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

97 ( #11,450 of 1,098,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #22,304 of 1,098,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.