Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):331-349 (2013)
|Abstract||This paper examines David Hull’s and Peter Godfrey-Smith’s accounts of biological individuality using the case of biofilms. Biofilms fail standard criteria for individuality, such as having reproductive bottlenecks and forming parent-offspring lineages. Nevertheless, biofilms are good candidates for individuals. The nature of biofilms shows that Godfrey-Smith’s account of individuality, with its reliance on reproduction, is too restrictive. Hull’s interactor notion of individuality better captures biofilms, and we argue that it offers a better account of biological individuality. However, Hull’s notion of interactor needs more precision. We suggest some ways to make Hull’s notion of interactor and his account of individuality more precise. Generally, we maintain that biofilms are a good test case for theories of individuality, and a careful examination of biofilms furthers our understanding of biological individuality|
|Keywords||Biofilms Biological individuality Individuals Interactors Reproduction|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ellen Clarke (forthcoming). The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals. Journal of Philosophy.
Ellen Clarke (2011). The Problem of Biological Individuality. Biological Theory 5 (4):312-325.
Marcel Quarfood (1999). The Individuality of Species: Some Reflections on the Debate. Synthese 120 (1):89-94.
Thomas A. C. Reydon (2009). Gene Names as Proper Names of Individuals: An Assessment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):409-432.
G. Roberto Burgio (1990). The “Biological Ego”. From Garrod's “Chemical Individuality” to Burnet's “Self”. Acta Biotheoretica 38 (2).
Jack Wilson (1999). Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge University Press.
Hans-Georg Moeller (2004). New Confucianism and the Semantics of Individuality. A Luhmannian Analysis. Asian Philosophy 14 (1):25 – 39.
Mauro Dorato & Matteo Morganti (2013). Grades of Individuality. A Pluralistic View of Identity in Quantum Mechanics and in the Sciences. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):591-610.
Marc Ereshefsky (1988). Individuality and Macroevolutionary Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:216 - 222.
Sarah R. Borden (2010). Thine Own Self: Individuality in Edith Stein's Later Writings. Catholic University of America Press.
I. Lowy (2003). On Guinea Pigs, Dogs and Men: Anaphylaxis and the Study of Biological Individuality, 1902-1939. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (3):399-423.
Johanna Seibt (1996). Non-Countable Individuals. Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (1):225-236.
Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart & Décio Krause (forthcoming). Why Non-Individuality? A Discussion on Individuality, Identity, and Cardinality in the Quantum Context. Erkenntnis.
Julian S. Huxley (1926). The Biological Basis of Individuality. Philosophy 1 (03):305-.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-06
Total downloads14 ( #83,151 of 549,125 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,125 )
How can I increase my downloads?