David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):361-383 (2001)
The vast majority of biological taxonomists use the Linnaean system when constructing classifications. Taxa are assigned Linnaean ranks and taxon names are devised according to the Linnaean rules of nomenclature. Unfortunately, the Linnaean system has become theoretically outdated. Moreover, its continued use causes a number of practical problems. This paper begins by sketching the ontological and practical problems facing the Linnaean system. Those problems are sufficiently pressing that alternative systems of classification should be investigated. A number of proposals for an alternative system are introduced and evaluated. The best aspects of those proposals are brought together to form a post-Linnaean system, and a comparison of the Linnaean and post-Linnaean systems is conducted. The final section of this paper considers not only the theoretical reasons for replacing the Linnaean system, but also the practical feasibility of adopting an alternative system.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Staffan Müller-Wille (2007). Collection and Collation: Theory and Practice of Linnaean Botany. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (3):541-562.
Müller-Wille Staffan (2007). Collection and Collation: Theory and Practice of Linnaean Botany. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C.
Gerry Webster (1993). Causes, Kinds and Forms. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (4):275-287.
Matthew H. Haber (2005). Book Review the Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):491-494.
Berent Enç (1975). Necessary Properties and Linnaean Essentialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83 - 102.
Berent Enc (1975). Necessary Propertes and Linnaean Essentialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83-102.
Marc Ereshefsky (2002). Linnaean Ranks: Vestiges of a Bygone Era. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315.
Marc Ereshefsky (1997). The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy. Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Marc Ereshefsky (2001). The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Marc Ereshefsky (1994). Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #207,220 of 1,696,508 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,508 )
How can I increase my downloads?