The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy

Cambridge University Press (2001)
Abstract
The question of whether biologists should continue to use the Linnaean hierarchy is a hotly debated issue. Invented before the introduction of evolutionary theory, Linnaeus's system of classifying organisms is based on outdated theoretical assumptions, and is thought to be unable to provide accurate biological classifications. Marc Ereshefsky argues that biologists should abandon the Linnaean system and adopt an alternative that is more in line with evolutionary theory. He traces the evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy from its introduction to the present. He illustrates how the continued use of this system hampers our ability to classify the organic world, and then goes on to make specific recommendations for a post-Linnaean method of classification. Accessible to a wide range of readers by providing introductory chapters to the philosophy of classification and the taxonomy of biology, the book will interest both scholars and students of biology and the philosophy of science.
Keywords Biology Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $46.97 new (64% off)   $47.93 used (63% off)   $104.98 direct from Amazon (18% off)    Amazon page
Call number QH83.E73 2001
ISBN(s) 0521781701
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Tim Lewens (2012). Human Nature: The Very Idea. Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):459-474.

    View all 16 citations

    Similar books and articles
    J. Dupre (1996). Review of Sober's "Philosophy of Biology". [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63:143-145.
    Ernst Mayr (1996). What is a Species, and What is Not? Philosophy of Science 63 (2):262-277.
    Marc Ereshefsky (2002). Linnaean Ranks: Vestiges of a Bygone Era. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315.
    M. Ereshefsky (2001). Names, Numbers and Indentations: A Guide to Post-Linnaean Taxonomy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):361-383.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-01-28

    Total downloads

    21 ( #68,698 of 1,088,384 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,384 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.