Graduate studies at Western
Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):501-521 (2008)
|Abstract||We argue that Paul Ricoeur’s work on narrative and alienation provides a largely untapped, though potentially fruitful way of re-thinking the question of political agency within the context of globalization. We argue that the political agency of many around the world has been placed in an exceedingly fragile position due to the rapid pace of globalization, the movement of multi-national corporations from their previous national headquarters, etc. We use Ricoeur’s work to argue that the alienation of globalization is not something that can be simply overcome either in a unified world-state or a retreat to protectionist nationalism, because institutional mediation—and consequently alienation—is in some sense constitutive of all politics: the world of political representation operates by its own set of rules, which are at least partially disconnected from the represented world. Using the work of Mouffe, a radical democratic theorist, we then flesh out an ideal of agonistic citizenship (which recognizes both the need for and the inevitability of discursive struggle in politics) in a number of overlapping communities of interest, rather than tying political participation solely to the sovereign government of my state. The state will remain important, but because globalization has disenfranchised so many from their participation in “local” modes of self-governance (tied to the state in which they live), we have a responsibility to re-envision what political participation means outside the traditional context of the state. Rather than merely citizens of a particular state, we need to begin thinking of ourselves politically—and then acting—as “citizens” of Green Peace, Human Rights Watch, Doctors Without Borders, or whatever other supra-local concrete universals or communities of interest to which we belong, investing the time and energy there that we might previously have invested solely in our state’s government. (By implication, we must also ensure that these organizations work in transparent democratic ways themselves.) We believe that by re-plotting our narratives of political engagement in this way, we can positively respond to the alienation created by globalization, while avoiding both the extremes of “McWorld” (hyperglobalism) and “Jihad” (complete skepticism towards, or war against globalization) that Benjamin Barber and David Held have recently described.|
|Keywords||Ricoeur Mouffe Radical democracy Globalization Citizenship Cosmopolitanism Agonism NGO Political philosophy Political theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wayne Norman (2006). Negotiating Nationalism: Nation-Building, Federalism, and Secession in the Multinational State. OUP Oxford.
Karl Marx (1996). Marx: Later Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Barbara Emadi-Coffin (2002). Rethinking International Organization: Deregulation and Global Governance. Routledge.
Simon Glezos (2012). The Politics of Speed: Capitalism, the State and War in an Accelerating World. Routledge.
M. Victoria Costa (2009). Citizenship and the State. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):987-997.
Annelies Decat (2012). Civilized Spaces and Extreme Horrors. An Interview with Saskia Sassen. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):377-386.
William Sites (2000). Primitive Globalization? State and Locale in Neoliberal Global Engagement. Sociological Theory 18 (1):121-144.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #23,750 of 722,936 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,936 )
How can I increase my downloads?