An experimental analysis of subception
American Journal of Psychology 69:625-34 (1956)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Urbach (1985). Randomization and the Design of Experiments. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):256-273.
Michela Massimi (2004). Non‐Defensible Middle Ground for Experimental Realism: Why We Are Justified to Believe in Colored Quarks. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):36-60.
Michael J. Hones (1990). Reproducibility as a Methodological Imperative in Experimental Research. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:585 - 599.
Janet Levin (2009). Experimental Philosophy. Analysis 69 (4):761-769.
Donald L. Rowe & James Wright (2001). Using Experimental Data and Analysis in EEG Modelling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):828-829.
Israel Goldiamond (1958). Indicators of Perception:. Subliminal Perception, Subception, Unconscious Perception 55:373-411.
H. J. Grosz & J. A. Zimmerman (1965). Experimental Analysis of Hysterical Blindness: A Follow-Up Report and New Experimental Data. Archives of General Psychiatry 13:255-60.
Fran (2008). Experimental Philosophers, Conceptual Analysts, and the Rest of Us. Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):143 – 149.
Richard S. Lazarus (1983). Autonomic Discrimination Without Awareness: A Study of Subception. Psychological Review 58:113-22.
C. W. Eriksen (1956). Subception: Fact or Artifact? Psychological Review 63:74-80.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,473 of 548,983 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
