David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):207-216 (2007)
There is a growing interest in ethical competence-building within nursing and health care practising. This tendency is accompanied by a remarkable growth of ethical guidelines. Ethical demands have also been laid down in laws. Present-day practitioners and researchers in health care are thereby left in a virtual cross-fire of various legislations, codes, and recommendations, all intended to guide behaviour. The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of ethical guidelines in the process of ethical competence-building within health care practice and medical research. A conceptual and critical philosophical analysis of some paragraphs of the Helsinki Declaration and of relevant literature was performed. Three major problems related to ethical guidelines were identified, namely, the interpretation problem (there is always a gap between the rule and the practice, which implies that ethical competence is needed for those who are to implement the guidelines); the multiplicity problem (the great number of codes, declarations, and laws might pull in different directions, which may confuse the health care providers who are to follow them); and the legalisation problem (ethics concerns may take on a legal form, where ethical reflection is replaced by a procedure of legal interpretations). Virtue ethics might be an alternative to a rule based approach. This position, however, can turn ethics into a tacit knowledge, leading to poorly reflected and inconsistent ethical decisions. Ethical competence must consist of both being (virtues) and doing (rules and principles), but also of knowing (critical reflection), and therefore a communicative based model is suggested.
|Keywords||codes communication ethical competence ethics regulation professionalism virtues|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A. T. Höglund, G. Helgesson & S. Eriksson (2010). Ethical Dilemmas and Ethical Competence in the Daily Work of Research Nurses. Health Care Analysis 18 (3):239-251.
Anna Julie Rasmussen & Mette Ebbesen (2014). Why Should Nanoscience Students Be Taught to Be Ethically Competent? Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):1065-1077.
Similar books and articles
Erich H. Loewy (1999). Health-Care Systems and Ethics: What Can We Learn? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (4):309-320.
Gert Olthuis & Godelieve Heterevann (2003). Multicultural Health Care in Practice. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):199-206.
Robert A. Pearlman (1992). An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
Dan W. Brock (2000). Broadening the Bioethics Agenda. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):21-38.
Raymond S. Edge (2005). Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice. Thomson Delmar Learning.
Imre Szebik (2003). Masked Ball: Ethics, Laws and Financial Contradictions in Hungarian Health Care. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1):109-124.
Catherine Anne Berglund (2004). Ethics for Health Care. Oxford University Press.
Jinger G. Hoop, Tony DiPasquale, Juan M. Hernandez & Laura Weiss Roberts (2008). Ethics and Culture in Mental Health Care. Ethics and Behavior 18 (4):353 – 372.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #144,957 of 1,410,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?