Discussion (A) Deconstruction, criminalisation and the criminal law: a reply to Pavlich's 'The Lore of Criminal Accusation'
Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):99-105 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Simon (2012). Precautionary Criminalisation in an Age of Vulnerable Autonomy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):277-279.
Stephen Shute & A. P. Simester (eds.) (2002). Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part. Oxford University Press.
Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Ronnie Lippens (2006). Discussion (B) Re-Ordering Ethical Sensitivity with Pavlich: Notes on Abolitionism. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):107-113.
R. A. Duff (2010). Towards a Theory of Criminal Law? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
George Pavlich (2006). The Lore of Criminal Accusation. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):79-97.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,715 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
