David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):255-269 (2012)
Substantial research efforts have been devoted to developing a cure for autism, but some advocates of people with autism claim that these efforts are misguided and even harmful. They claim that there is nothing wrong with people with autism, so there is nothing to cure. Others argue that autism is a serious and debilitating disorder and that a cure for autism would be a wonderful medical breakthrough. Our goal in this essay is to evaluate what assumptions underlie each of these positions. We evaluate the arguments made on each side, reject those that are implausible and then highlight the key assumptions of those that remain
|Keywords||Autism Ethics Cure Disability Bioethics Medical ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Piers Benn (1999). Freedom, Resentment, and the Psychopath. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 6 (1):29-39.
Joel Feinberg (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Fenton & Tim Krahn (2009). Autism, Neurodiversity and Equality Beyond The'normal'. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (2):2.
R. Peter Hobson (1993). The Emotional Origins of Social Understanding. Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):227 – 249.
Jeanette Kennett (2002). Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):340-357.
Citations of this work BETA
T. M. Krahn & A. Fenton (2012). Funding Priorities: Autism and the Need for a More Balanced Research Agenda in Canada. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):296-310.
Similar books and articles
Jami L. Anderson (2013). A Dash of Autism. In Jami L. Anderson Simon Cushing (ed.), The Philosophy of Autism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Jami L. Anderson & Simon Cushing (eds.) (2013). The Philosophy of Autism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Barbara Russell (2012). Reflections on 'Autistic Integrity'. Bioethics 26 (3):164-170.
Charlotte Moore (2008). Thoughts About the Autism Label: A Parental View. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):493-498.
Anne E. McGuire & Rod Michalko (2011). Minds Between Us: Autism, Mindblindness and the Uncertainty of Communication. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (2):162-177.
Tony Charman (2001). Understanding the Imitation Deficit in Autism May Lead to a More Specific Model of Autism as an Empathy Disorder. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):29-30.
Somogy Varga (2010). Explaining Impaired Play in Autism. Journal für Philosophie Und Psychiatrie 3 (1):1-13.
Francesca Happ & Uta Frith (eds.) (2010). Autism and Talent. Oup/the Royal Society.
Kristin Andrews (2002). Interpreting Autism: A Critique of Davidson on Thought and Language. Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):317-332.
Tony Charman (2005). Why Do Individuals with Autism Lack the Motivation or Capacity to Share Intentions? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):695-696.
Timothy Krahn & Andrew Fenton (2012). The Extreme Male Brain Theory of Autism and the Potential Adverse Effects for Boys and Girls with Autism. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):93-103.
Alexandra Perry (2012). Autism Beyond Pediatrics: Why Bioethicists Ought to Rethink Consent in Light of Chronicity and Genetic Identity. Bioethics 26 (5):236-241.
Marcus P. Adams (2013). Explaining the Theory of Mind Deficit in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Philosophical Studies 163 (1):233-249.
Robert M. Gordon & John A. Barker (1994). Autism and the "Theory of Mind" Debate. In George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. MIT Press.
Added to index2011-08-12
Total downloads32 ( #63,119 of 1,410,002 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,676 of 1,410,002 )
How can I increase my downloads?