Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play (2005)
|Abstract||This paper presents a framework for discussing issues of ownership in connection to virtual worlds. We explore how divergent interests in virtual property can be mediated by applying a constructivist perspective to the concept ownership. The simple solutions offered today entail that a contract between the game producer and the gamer gives the game developer exclusive rights to all virtual property. This appears to be unsatisfactory. A number of legitimate interests on part of both producers and gamers may be readily distinguished. More complex distributions of rights would allow many of these interests to be consistently respected.|
|Keywords||virtual worlds conflicting interests ownership property rights online games|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Ashley John Craft (2007). Sin in Cyber-Eden: Understanding the Metaphysics and Morals of Virtual Worlds. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (3):205-217.
Murray Hofmans-Sheard (2005). Preserving Common Rights Within Private Property. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):3-9.
Richard R. Wilk (1999). Whose Forest? Whose Land? Whose Ruins? Ethics and Conservation. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):367-374.
Larry May (1986). Corporate Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):225 - 232.
J. M. Elegido (1995). Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):411 - 416.
Added to index2009-06-18
Total downloads46 ( #28,233 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?