Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):167-178 (2011)
|Abstract||This article uses Walter Benjamin's theoretical claims in the 'Critique of violence' to shed light on some current conceptualisations of terrorism. It suggests an understanding of terrorism as an essentially contested concept. If the theorist uncritically adopts the state's account of terrorism, she occludes an important dimension of the phenomenon that allows for a rethinking of the state's claim to a monopoly on legitimate violence. Benjamin's essay conceptualises the state as resulting from a conjunction of violence, law, legitimacy and power that rests on mythical ideas about nature and history. It shows why the state claims to be justified in taking exceptional measures when this link is challenged and when its prerogative to the legitimate use of force is called into question. This, I argue, is what terrorism does. Thus, Benjamin's essay adds to a more nuanced and less one-sided understanding of both terrorism and state violence|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Igor Primoratz (ed.) (2004). Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
Virginia Held (2004). Terrorism and War. Journal of Ethics 8 (1):59-75.
Paul Gilbert (1994). Terrorism, Security, and Nationality: An Introductory Study in Applied Political Philosophy. Routledge.
Matthew R. Silliman (2004). Weighing Evils. Social Philosophy Today 20:129-136.
Virginia Held (1997). The Media and Political Violence. Journal of Ethics 1 (2):187-202.
Scott C. Lowe (2006). Defining Terrorism. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:253-256.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads23 ( #60,196 of 731,534 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,534 )
How can I increase my downloads?