Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302 (2012)
|Abstract||Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories of legitimacy and justice. Second, it develops a conceptual framework that distinguishes between necessary conditions, aspects and aims of democracy. On this basis it specifies three objectives of democracy, some of which may also hold for multilevel governance. It is argued that there are in principle at least three reasons to value democratic institutions: they are intrinsically justified to the extent that they distribute fair shares of political influence over decision-making; they are instrumentally justified to the extent that they secure several of our other best interests, one of which is our interest in non-domination; and finally, they are also instrumentally justified insofar as they secure the just distribution of other goods. The aim of this framework is not to develop a specific theory of multilevel governance but to point at important distinctions to be made and normative criteria to be specified. The intention is to take the debate forward by noting some of the issues that any satisfactory account must address. The framework lays out the grounds for analysing the institutional challenges facing legitimate multilevel governance through what is speculatively called ?multiple citizenship?, understood in explorative terms, opening the door for the manifold roles that citizens could and ought to play in multilevel governance, not only as democratic agents, but also as agents of democracy and agents of justice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eva Erman (2011). Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4).
Randall D. Germain & Michael Kenny (eds.) (2005). The Idea of Global Civil Society: Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era. Routledge.
Terry Macdonald (2008). Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. OUP Oxford.
Andreas Rasche & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert (2012). Institutionalizing Global Governance: The Role of the United Nations Global Compact. Business Ethics 21 (1):100-114.
Andrew Crane, Dirk Matten & Jeremy Moon (2004). Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):107-122.
Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee (2010). Governing the Global Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):265-274.
Eva Erman (forthcoming). In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance". European Journal of International Relations.
David Wiens (forthcoming). Achieving Global Justice: Why Failures Matter More Than Ideals. In Kate Brennan (ed.), Making Global Institutions Work: Power, Accountability and Change. Routledge.
Clifton Sanders (2009). Democracy as Music, Music as Democracy. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):219-239.
Bernard Crick (2007). Citizenship: The Political and the Democratic. British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (3):235 - 248.
Ronald Jeurissen (2004). Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):87-96.
C. S. King (2013). Economic Theories of Democratic Legitimacy and the Normative Role of an Ideal Consensus. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):156-178.
Added to index2011-12-20
Total downloads15 ( #78,551 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?