David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):377-400 (2006)
There is an underlying idea of symmetry involved in most notions of rationality. From a dialogical philosophical standpoint, however, the symmetry implied by social contract theories and so-called Golden Rule thinking is anchored to a Cartesian subjectobject world and is therefore not equipped to address recognition at least not if recognition is to be understood as something happening between subjects. For this purpose, the dialogical symmetry implied by Habermas' communicative action does a much better job. Still, it is insufficient to embrace those kinds of recognition that are dependent on asymmetry and concrete difference. This article explores how communicative action could meet the demand of recognition by investigating a complementary source of validity in communicative rationality, apart from Habermas' validity claims, in which inter is better characterized as mutuality than as symmetry. By recognizing both sources of validity, communicative action can open the door more fully to all aspects of recognition without giving up its universal pragmatic core. Key Words: communicative action communicative rationality discourse ethics Jürgen Habermas Axel Honneth recognition universal pragmatics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen (2007). From Human-Centred to Human-Context Centred Approach: Looking Back Over 'the Hills', What has Been Gained and Lost? [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (4):471-495.
Similar books and articles
Kyung-Man Kim (2011). Habermas on Understanding: Virtual Participation, Dialogue and the Universality of Truth. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):393-406.
P. Canivez (2011). Pathologies of Recognition. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):851-887.
Barbara Fultner (2002). Inferentialism and Communicative Action: Robust Conceptions of Intersubjectivity. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):121 - 131.
Gerhard Wagner & Heinz Zipprian (1991). Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action. Inquiry 34 (1):49 – 62.
Raimo Tuomela (2002). Collective Goals and Communicative Action. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:29-64.
Ali Mesbah, Religion, Rationality, and Language : A Critical Analysis of Jürgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
Lawrence B. Solum (1989). Freedom of Communicative Action. Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #139,330 of 1,796,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #349,760 of 1,796,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?