David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 1 (1):23- (1985)
General equilibrium analysis is a theoretical structure which focuses research in economics. On this point economists and philosophers agree. Yet studies in general equilibrium analyses are not well understood in the sense that, though their importance is recognized, their role in the growth of economic knowledge is a subject of some controversy. Several questions organize an appraisal of general equilibrium analysis. These questions have been variously posed by philosophers of science, economic methodologists, and historians of economic thought. Is general equilibrium analysis a theory, a paradigm, a scientific research program, or a set of interrelated theories? Is it not any of these but rather a branch of applied mathematics? Is GE analysis associated with the growth of knowledge, or does it waste intellectual resources? How is it related to other work in economics? Is it connected to, or is it apart from, the concerns of applied economists?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Imre Lakatos (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Imre Lakatos (ed.) (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press.
M. Blaug (1983). The Methodology of Economics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):289-295.
Alexander Rosenberg (1983). If Economics Isn't Science, What Is It? Philosophical Forum 14 (3):296.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrea Salanti (1991). Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal: Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else? Economics and Philosophy 7 (2):221.
Arnis Vilks (1992). A Set of Axioms for Neoclassical Economics and the Methodological Status of the Equilibrium Concept. Economics and Philosophy 8 (1):51.
Similar books and articles
Elias L. Khalil & Alain Marciano (2010). The Equivalence of Neo-Darwinism and Walrasian Equilibrium: In Defense of Organismus Economicus. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):229-248.
Neil Hart (1996). Equilibrium and Time: Marshall's Dilemma. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):285-306.
Brian Skyrms (2000). Stability and Explanatory Significance of Some Simple Evolutionary Models. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):94-113.
Christopher Phelan (1987). A Defense of Rational Expectations / General Equilibrium Analysis Against Austrian Objections. Critical Review 1 (4):100-108.
Andrea Salanti (1993). Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis: A REPLY. Economics and Philosophy 9 (2):283.
Roger E. Backhouse (1993). Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis. Economics and Philosophy 9 (2):271.
Ben Eggleston (2010). Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think About Morality. Mind 119 (475):549 - 584.
Frank Ackerman (2002). Still Dead After All These Years: Interpreting the Failure of General Equilibrium Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (2):119-139.
Roger E. Backhouse (2004). History and Equilibrium: A Partial Defense of Equilibrium Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):291-305.
John H. Beck (2005). Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):355-362.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #466,404 of 1,907,145 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #467,610 of 1,907,145 )
How can I increase my downloads?