David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 1 (1):23- (1985)
General equilibrium analysis is a theoretical structure which focuses research in economics. On this point economists and philosophers agree. Yet studies in general equilibrium analyses are not well understood in the sense that, though their importance is recognized, their role in the growth of economic knowledge is a subject of some controversy. Several questions organize an appraisal of general equilibrium analysis. These questions have been variously posed by philosophers of science, economic methodologists, and historians of economic thought. Is general equilibrium analysis a theory, a paradigm, a scientific research program, or a set of interrelated theories? Is it not any of these but rather a branch of applied mathematics? Is GE analysis associated with the growth of knowledge, or does it waste intellectual resources? How is it related to other work in economics? Is it connected to, or is it apart from, the concerns of applied economists?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Imre Lakatos (ed.) (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press.
Imre Lakatos (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Stegmüller, Wolfgang Balzer & Wolfgang Spohn (eds.) (1982). Philosophy of Economics: Proceedings, Munich, July 1981. Springer-Verlag.
Citations of this work BETA
Arnis Vilks (1992). A Set of Axioms for Neoclassical Economics and the Methodological Status of the Equilibrium Concept. Economics and Philosophy 8 (01):51-.
Andrea Salanti (1991). Roy Weintraub's Studies in Appraisal: Lakatosian Consolations or Something Else? Economics and Philosophy 7 (02):221-.
Similar books and articles
Elias L. Khalil & Alain Marciano (2010). The Equivalence of Neo-Darwinism and Walrasian Equilibrium: In Defense of Organismus Economicus. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):229-248.
Roger E. Backhouse (2004). History and Equilibrium: A Partial Defense of Equilibrium Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11 (3):291-305.
Frank Ackerman (2002). Still Dead After All These Years: Interpreting the Failure of General Equilibrium Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (2):119-139.
Ben Eggleston (2010). Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think About Morality. Mind 119 (475):549 - 584.
Roger E. Backhouse (1993). Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis. Economics and Philosophy 9 (02):271-.
Andrea Salanti (1993). Lakatosian Perspectives on General Equilibrium Analysis: A REPLY. Economics and Philosophy 9 (02):283-.
Christopher Phelan (1987). A Defense of Rational Expectations / General Equilibrium Analysis Against Austrian Objections. Critical Review 1 (4):100-108.
Brian Skyrms (2000). Stability and Explanatory Significance of Some Simple Evolutionary Models. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):94-113.
Neil Hart (1996). Equilibrium and Time: Marshall's Dilemma. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):285-306.
John H. Beck (2005). Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):355-362.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads5 ( #338,493 of 1,700,233 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,233 )
How can I increase my downloads?