David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphysica 8 (1):53-59 (2007)
The distinctions between A-series and B-series, between synchronic and diachronic identity and between perdurance and endurance are basic in the philosophy of time; yet they are flawed. McTaggart’s claim that the B-series is static and that a series has to be changing to be really temporal arises from a misunderstanding of temporal relations and of the task of ontological analysis. The dynamic appearance of the A-series results from the incompleteness of the analysis. “Synchronic identity” is synonymous with “strict identity”, which has nothing to do with simultaneity. “Diachronic Identity” is another designation for persistence of an ordinary thing through time and change. Now, strict self-identity holds independently of whether a thing has a short or a long duration. Hence, diachronic identity is synchronic identity. Lewis’ distinguishes two kinds of ontological analyses of persistence, the perdurance and the endurance analysis. This dichotomy is in several respects not exhaustive. Above all, his definition of “persist” is inadequate being based on the notion of multiple temporal localisation which is apt with interrupted but misplaced with persistent, i.e., temporally continuous objects
|Keywords||Time McTaggart Perdurance Endurance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Cordula Brand (2009). Am I Still Me? Personal Identity in Neuroethical Debates. Medicine Studies 1 (4):393-406.
Similar books and articles
Konrad Talmont-Kaminski & John D. Collier (2004). Saving the Distinctions: Distinctions as the Epistemologically Significant Content of Experience. In Johann Christian Marek & Maria Elisabeth Reicher (eds.), Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society Xii. Austrian L. Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg.
I. L. Humberstone (1996). Intrinsic/Extrinsic. Synthese 108 (2):205-267.
Kurt Stocker (2012). The Time Machine in Our Mind. Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Erwin Tegtmeier (2009). Ontology of Time and Hyperdynamism. Metaphysica 10 (2):185-198.
George N. Reeke (1999). Getting the Vehicle Moving. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-166.
Samet Bagce (2011). Reichenbach on the Relative a Priori and the Context of Discovery/Justification Distinction. Synthese 181 (1):79 - 93.
James Harrington (2009). What "Becomes" in Temporal Becoming? American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):249-265.
Rohan French (2012). An Argument Against General Validity? Thought 1 (1):4-9.
Jill North (2003). Understanding the Time-Asymmetry of Radiation. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1086-1097.
Ulrich Meyer (2011). Time and Modality. In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. 91--121.
Christoph Hoerl & Teresa McCormack (2011). Time in Cognitive Development. In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads14 ( #110,445 of 1,096,899 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #53,842 of 1,096,899 )
How can I increase my downloads?