The standing of psychoanalysis
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):115-128 (1984)
| Abstract | tries to elucidate some of the rational considerations that determine the standing and value of psychoanalysis. He is sceptical about much of the positive evidence, but he also tries to provide some support for Freudian doctrines. I examine his supporting arguments and try to show that they have serious weaknesses. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBarry Richards (1989). Images of Freud: Cultural Responses to Psychoanalysis. St. Martin's Press.
Roland Peterson & Sybe Terwee (1994). Can Functionalism Provide the Proper Basis for a Core Theory of Psychoanalysis? Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469.
Edward H. Madden (1966). Explanation in Psychoanalysis and History. Philosophy of Science 33 (3):278-286.
Michael Lavin (1984). Book Review:The Standing of Psychoanalysis B. A. Farrell. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 51 (1):177-.
Howard S. Ruttenberg (1984). Book Review:The Standing of Psychoanalysis. B. A. Farrell. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (2):350-.
Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) (2009). Psychoanalysis, Fascism, and Fundamentalism. Edinburgh University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #94,544 of 556,775 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,775 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
