British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):115-128 (1984)
|Abstract||tries to elucidate some of the rational considerations that determine the standing and value of psychoanalysis. He is sceptical about much of the positive evidence, but he also tries to provide some support for Freudian doctrines. I examine his supporting arguments and try to show that they have serious weaknesses.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barry Richards (1989). Images of Freud: Cultural Responses to Psychoanalysis. St. Martin's Press.
Roland Peterson & Sybe Terwee (1994). Can Functionalism Provide the Proper Basis for a Core Theory of Psychoanalysis? Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469.
Edward H. Madden (1966). Explanation in Psychoanalysis and History. Philosophy of Science 33 (3):278-286.
Michael Lavin (1984). Book Review:The Standing of Psychoanalysis B. A. Farrell. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 51 (1):177-.
Howard S. Ruttenberg (1984). Book Review:The Standing of Psychoanalysis. B. A. Farrell. [REVIEW] Ethics 94 (2):350-.
Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) (2009). Psychoanalysis, Fascism, and Fundamentalism. Edinburgh University Press.
Evelien Geerts, Luce Irigaray: The (Un)Dutiful Daughter of Psychoanalysis. A Feminist ‘Moving Through and Beyond’ the Phallogocentric Discourse of Psychoanalysis.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,057 of 722,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?