David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):15-41 (2008)
Kepler’s theory of the soul: a study on epistemology Jorge M. Escobara, aUniversidad de Antioquia, Calle 67 #53-108, Of. 12-434, Medellín, Colombia Received 5 June 2006; revised 22 December 2006. Available online 6 March 2008.Kepler is mainly known among historians of science for his astronomical theories and his approaches to problems having to do with philosophy of science and ontology. This paper attempts to contribute to Kepler studies by providing a discussion of a topic not frequently considered, namely Kepler’s theory of the soul, a general theory of knowledge whose central problem is what makes knowledge possible, rather than what makes knowledge true, as happens in the case of Descartes’s and Bacon’s epistemologies. Kepler’s theory consists of four issues: the theory of the different sorts of soul—that is, the human soul, the animal soul, the vegetable soul, and the Earth soul—concerning their faculties, the differences and the resemblances emerging among them, the relation they maintain with their own bodies and the world, and the distinction soul–world. The paper discusses these issues from a historical perspective, that is, it reconstructs the way they appear in three periods of Kepler’s career: the period prior to the publication of the Mysterium cosmographicum, the period from 1596 to 1611, and the period of the Harmonices mundi libri V. Finally, Kepler’s epistemology is briefly contrasted with Descartes’s and Bacon’s in order to suggest that Kepler’s could be seen as a third way to understand the philosophical origins of Modernity. Keywords: Johannes Kepler; René Descartes; Francis Bacon; Anima; Force; Animism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wilbur Applebaum (1996). Keplerian Astronomy After Kepler: Researches and Problems. History of Science 34:451-504.
Francis Bacon (1969). The Works of Francis Bacon. St. Clair Shores, Mich.,Scholarly Press.
Frédéric de Buzon (forthcoming). Harmonie et métaphysique: Mersenne face a Kepler. Les Etudes Philosophiques.
Raz D. Chen-Morris (2001). Optics, Imagination, and the Construction of Scientific Observation in Kepler's New Science. The Monist 84 (4):453-486.
Giovanna Cifoletti (1986). Kepler'sDe quantitatibus. Annals of Science 43 (3):213-238.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
L. Nathan Oaklander (2001). Personal Identity, Immortality, and the Soul. Philo 4 (2):185-194.
Michael Davis (2011). The Soul of the Greeks: An Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
JohanArnt Myrstad (2004). The Use of Converse Abduction in Kepler. Foundations of Science 9 (3):321-338.
Stewart Goetz (2011). A Brief History of the Soul. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sven Dupré (2012). Kepler's Optics Without Hypotheses. Synthese 185 (3):501-525.
Peter Barker (2002). Constructing Copernicus. Perspectives on Science 10 (2):208-227.
Werner Diederich (2010). Contingency in Nature. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):269-277.
Ralph H. Abraham (2006). The New Sacred Math. World Futures 62 (1 & 2):6 – 16.
Georg Schuppener (1997). Kepler's Relation to the Jesuits—A Study of His Correspondence with Paul Guldin. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 5 (1):236-244.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #161,941 of 1,699,670 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,670 )
How can I increase my downloads?