Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):47 - 58 (2011)
|Abstract||In this article, I discuss the location of the sources of global poverty and injustice. I take it as granted that the members of the globally lowest income group live in unacceptable conditions and suffer from injustice. Yet the source of this injustice is a debatable question. Often the existing global institutions are seen as major causes behind this injustice. By taking the World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations as a practical example, I aim to show that blaming the institutions as such can lead to misguided conclusions. The WTO, in fact, is quite just if one merely analyses its institutional structure. I argue that the major source of injustice are rather the prevailing power structures and the conduct of individual governments within this institutional framework, in other words the metaprocedural unfairness in the trade negotiations. I further argue that applications of Rawlsian theory of justice tend to be misleading at the global institutional level, as they focus disproportionately on the institutional structure, and tend to underestimate the relevance of the conduct of governments and the existing power structures, which allow powerful countries to use the institutional framework unjustly in their favour|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sagar Sanyal (2009). Political Equality and Global Poverty: An Alternative Egalitarian Approach to Distributive Justice. Dissertation, University of Canterbury
Kate Macdonald & Terry Macdonald (2010). Democracy in a Pluralist Global Order: Corporate Power and Stakeholder Representation. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):19-43.
Daniel M. Weinstock (ed.) (2007). Global Justice, Global Institutions. University of Calgary Press.
Magnus Reitberger (2008). Poverty, Negative Duties and the Global Institutional Order. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):379-402.
David Wiens (2012). Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (1):45-70.
András Miklós (2011). The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice. Utilitas 23 (2):161-182.
Louis P. Pojman (2006). The Case for World Government. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:59-80.
Henning Hahn (2009). The Global Consequence of Participatory Responsibility. Journal of Global Ethics 5 (1):43 – 56.
Sagar Sanyal (2009). US Military and Covert Action and Global Justice. International Journal of applied philosophy 23 (2):213-234.
Simon Caney (2006). Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design. Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):725-756.
Yasushi Suzuki (2012). An Institutional Political Economy View on Thomas Nagel's 'Minimum Humanitarian Morality' in Global Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3):169-178.
Kristian Toft (2012). GMOs and Global Justice: Applying Global Justice Theory to the Case of Genetically Modified Crops and Food. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):223-237.
Terry Macdonald (2008). Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. OUP Oxford.
Cristina Lafont (2010). Accountability and Global Governance: Challenging the State-Centric Conception of Human Rights. Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3).
Allison B. Wolf (2005). Can Global Justice Provide a Path Toward Achieving Justice Across the Americas? Journal of Global Ethics 1 (2):153 – 176.
Added to index2011-04-17
Total downloads19 ( #71,180 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?