Some remarks in reply to professor Hartshorne
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 18 (4):521-522 (1958)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesCharles Hartshorne (1955). Process as Inclusive Category: A Reply. Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):94-102.
Charles Hartshorne (1970). Ontological Primacy: A Reply to Buchler. Journal of Philosophy 67 (23):979-986.
Henry S. Leonard (1961). A Reply to Professor Wheatley. Philosophy of Science 28 (1):55-64.
Phillip Cole (2002). Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne. Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
William Elton (1945). Professor Hartshorne's Syllogism: Criticism. Philosophical Review 54 (5):506.
Henry Leonard (1961). A Reply to Professor Wheatley's Note on Professor Leonard's Analysis of Interrogatives, Etc. Philosophy of Science 28 (January):55-64.
James F. Anderson (1949). Remarks on Professor Cunningham's "Reply". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10 (2):262.
Charles Hartshorne (1945). Professor Hartshorne's Syllogism: Rejoinder. Philosophical Review 54 (5):506-508.
Charles Hartshorne (1958). Whitehead on Process: A Reply to Professor Eslick. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 18 (4):514-520.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,951 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
