Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):215-226 (2006)
|Abstract||A global information ethics that seeks to avoid imperialistic homogenization must conjoin shared norms while simultaneously preserving the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples. I argue that a global information ethics may fulfill these requirements by taking up an ethical pluralism – specifically Aristotle’s pros hen [“towards one”] or “focal” equivocals. These ethical pluralisms figure centrally in both classical and contemporary Western ethics: they further offer important connections with the major Eastern ethical tradition of Confucian thought. Both traditions understand ethical judgment to lead to and thus require ethical pluralism – i.e., an acceptance of more than one judgment regarding the interpretation and application of a shared ethical norm. Both traditions invoke notions of resonance and harmony to articulate pluralistic structures of connection alongside irreducible differences. Specific examples within Western computer and information ethics demonstrate these pluralisms in fact working in praxis. After reviewing further resonances and radical differences between Western and Eastern views, I then argue that emerging conceptions of privacy and data privacy protection laws in China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Thailand in fact constitute a robust, pros hen pluralism with Western conceptions. In both theory and in praxis, then, this pluralism thus fulfills the requirement for a global information ethics that holds shared norms alongside the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples.|
|Keywords||Aristotle Charles Taylor Confucius John Rawls Plato data privacy protection ethical dogmatism ethical pluralism ethical relativism harmony judgment privacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Myers & Leigh Miller (1996). Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Information Technology: An Aristotelian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 6 (2):153 – 160.
James H. Moor (1999). Just Consequentialism and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.
Zonghao Bao & Kun Xiang (2006). Digitalization and Global Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (1):41-47.
Lü Yao-Huai (2005). Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):7-15.
Matteo Turilli & Luciano Floridi (2009). The Ethics of Information Transparency. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2):105-112.
Luciano Floridi (2002). Information Ethics. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):39-45.
Ana Marta González (2003). Ethics in Global Business and in a Plural Society. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1):23 - 36.
Edward H. Spence (2009). A Universal Model for the Normative Evaluation of Internet Information. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):243-253.
Charles Ess (2008). Luciano Floridi's Philosophy of Information and Information Ethics: Critical Reflections and the State of the Art. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):89-96.
Kei Hiruta (2006). What Pluralism, Why Pluralism, and How? A Response to Charles Ess. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):227-236.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,252 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?