Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648 (2011)
|Abstract||Timely public engagement in science presents a broad challenge. It includes more than research into the ethical, legal and social dimensions of science and state-initiated citizen’s participation. Introducing a public perspective on science while safeguarding its public value involves a diverse set of actors: natural scientists and engineers, technology assessment institutes, policy makers, social scientists, citizens, interest organisations, artists, and last, but not least, politicians|
|Keywords||Participation Public understanding of science Technology assessment Upstream public engagement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rinie van Est (2011). The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds (2009). Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Alison Mohr (2011). Publics in the Making: Mediating Different Methods of Engagement and the Publics These Construct. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):667-672.
Sheila Jasanoff (2011). Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):621-638.
Brian Wynne (2011). Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):791-800.
Alan Irwin (1995). Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. Routledge.
Erik Fisher (2011). Editorial Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Charles Thorpe (2010). Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. [REVIEW] Minerva 48 (4):389-411.
Bruce V. Lewenstein (2011). Experimenting with Engagement. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):817-821.
Robert Doubleday (2007). The Laboratory Revisited. NanoEthics 1 (2):167-176.
Matthew Kearnes & Brian Wynne (2007). On Nanotechnology and Ambivalence: The Politics of Enthusiasm. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (2):131-142.
Brian E. Wynne, Public Engagement as Means of Restoring Trust in Science? Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music.
Martin Bridgstock (ed.) (1998). Science, Technology, and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Corinna Jung (2009). Towards More Confidence: About the Roles of Social Scientists in Participatory Policy Making. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):125-129.
David Resnik (2011). Scientific Research and the Public Trust. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):399-409.
Added to index2011-07-23
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?