What has been the outcome of the ILP/ELP debate?
In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPoul Kjaer (2006). Systems in Context: On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann Debate. Ancilla Iuris 1:66-77.
Eric Funkhouser (2009). Frankfurt Cases and Overdetermination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 341-369.
Stephen Sherblom (2008). The Legacy of the 'Care Challenge': Re-Envisioning the Outcome of the Justice-Care Debate. Journal of Moral Education 37 (1):81-98.
C. Hitchcock (1999). Contrastive Explanation and the Demons of Determinism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):585-612.
Daniel Viehoff (2011). Debate: Procedure and Outcome in the Justification of Authority. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (2):248-259.
Katsumi Sasaki (2002). A Cut-Free Sequent System for the Smallest Interpretability Logic. Studia Logica 70 (3):353-372.
Jules L. Coleman (2009). Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism. Ratio Juris 22 (3):359-394.
Maarten Rijke (1991). A Note on the Interpretability Logic of Finitely Axiomatized Theories. Studia Logica 50 (2):241 - 250.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
