David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 29 (3):247-266 (2007)
Although nonhuman entities are indeed incapable of entering into contractual relations with humans or of participating in social dialogue on ethical norms, they can nonetheless become the objects of moral consideration on the part of humans. Moral consideration need not be extended universally to all nonnatural entities, but only to those entities with which humans interact. Rather than regard some or all of the natural world as having “intrinsic value,” considered judgments must be made regarding which parts of nature can be legitimately used for human purposes and which should be left alone. What needs to be justified are not attempts to preserve nature but rather any human interventions which infringe on the autonomy of nature
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard J. Evanoff (2007). Communicative Ethics and Moral Considerability. Environmental Ethics 29 (3):247-266.
Benjamin Hale (2006). The Moral Considerability of Invasive Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (4):337-366.
Andrew Brennan (1984). The Moral Standing of Natural Objects. Environmental Ethics 6 (1):35-56.
Matthew Pianalto (2011). Comparing Lives: Rush Rhees on Humans and Animals. Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):287-311.
Roger Paden (1992). Nature and Morality. Environmental Ethics 14 (3):239-251.
Lawrence E. Johnson (1992). Toward the Moral Considerability of Species and Ecosystems. Environmental Ethics 14 (2):145-157.
Richard A. Watson (1979). Self-Consciousness and the Rights of Nonhuman Animals and Nature. Environmental Ethics 1 (2):99-129.
Toby Svoboda (2012). Duties Regarding Nature: A Kantian Approach to Environmental Ethics. Kant Yearbook 4 (1):143-163.
W. Murray Hunt (1980). Are Mere Things Morally Considerable? Environmental Ethics 2 (1):59-65.
A. M. Weisberger (2003). Animal Rights Within Judaism: The Nature of the Relationship Between Religion and Ethics. Sophia 42 (1):77-84.
G. E. Varner (1985). The Schopenhauerian Challenge in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 7 (3):209-229.
Benjamin Hale (2011). Moral Considerability: Deontological, Not Metaphysical. Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):37-62.
Mark H. Bernstein (1998). On Moral Considerability: An Essay on Who Morally Matters. Oxford University Press.
Yeuk-Sze Lo (1999). Natural and Artifactual: Restored Nature as Subject. Environmental Ethics 21 (3):247-266.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #168,430 of 1,098,792 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #57,571 of 1,098,792 )
How can I increase my downloads?