Graduate studies at Western
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:61-65 (2007)
|Abstract||Plato wrote dialogues, and he praised dialectic, or conversation, as a suitable style for fruitful philosophical investigation. His works are great literature; and nodoubt this quality derives much from their form as dialogues. They also have definite philosophical content; and an important part of this content is their dialecticalepistemology. Dialectic is part of the content of Plato's philosophy. Can we reconcile this content with his literary style? I shall examine and sharpen the sense of this problem by referring to four passages from different works of Plato: Parmenides 132b-c, Protagoras 351-2, Sophist 248-9, Republic 592. In these passages we can distinguish a main position, which represents what it is natural to label Platonism, from a line of thought which diverges from that position and yet also seems authentically Platonic. I argue that the solution to this tension lies in the notion of dialectic as a tentative and exploratory method of philosophy. This view of dialectic is in some conflict with Plato's official account of the method as guaranteed to deliver fundamental truth; but that conflict presents one more version of the phenomenon which I am exploring. The theory of dialectic provides philosophical support for the method of dialogue. That is how philosophy and literature are linked in Plato's pursuit of truth|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Julius Stenzel (1940/1973). Plato's Method of Dialectic. New York,Arno Press.
Jakob L. Fink (2012). Form and Content in the Philosophical Dialogue: Dialectic and Dialogue in the Lysis / Morten S. Thaning ; The Laches and 'Joint Search' Dialectic / Holger Thesleff ; The Philosophical Importance of the Dialogue Form for Plato / Charles H. Kahn ; How Did Aristotle Read a Platonic Dialogue? In , The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
D. V. Nikulin (2010). Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford University Press.
Francisco J. Gonzalez (2009). Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Richard Robinson (1953/1984). Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford University Press.
Hallvard Fossheim (2012). Dialectic as Inter-Personal Activity: Self-Refutation and Dialectic in Plato and Aristotle / Luca Castagnoli ; The Role of the Respondent in Plato and Aristotle / Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila ; Division as a Method in Plato. In Jakob L. Fink (ed.), The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Dirk Baltzly (1999). Aristotle and Platonic Dialectic in Metaphysics Gamma. Apeiron 32 (4):171-202.
Jakob L. Fink (ed.) (2012). The Development of Dialectic From Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
H. H. Benson (2012). The Problem is Not Mathematics, but Mathematicians: Plato and the Mathematicians Again. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):170-199.
Francisco J. González (1998). Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato's Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Northwestern University Press.
Daniel Werner (2010). Rhetoric and Philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus. Greece and Rome 57 (1):21-46.
J. Tate (1940). Plato's Dialectic Julius Stenzel: Plato's Method of Dialectic. Translated and Edited by D.J. Allan. Pp. Xliii+170. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940. Cloth, 10s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (03):143-144.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads7 ( #142,779 of 751,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 751,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?