Hypatia 17 (3):237 - 250 (2002)
|Abstract||Love's Labor explores the relations that dependency work fosters between women and between men and women, and argues that dependency is not exceptional but integral to human life. The commentaries point to more facets of dependency such as the importance (and limitation) of personal narrative in philosophizing dependency (Ruddick); the role of spirituality that Gottlieb addresses with regard to his disabled daughter; and the application of the theory to the situation of elderly women (Tong)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Asha Bhandary (2010). Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique? Hypatia 25 (1):140-156.
Martha E. Gimenez (2005). Capitalism and the Oppression of Women: Marx Revisited. Science and Society 69 (1):11 - 32.
Eva Feder Kittay (1995). Taking Dependency Seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act Considered in Light of the Social Organization of Dependency Work and Gender Equality. Hypatia 10 (1):8 - 29.
Shiloh Y. Whitney (2011). Dependency Relations: Corporeal Vulnerability and Norms of Personhood in Hobbes and Kittay. Hypatia 26 (3):554-574.
Martha Nussbaum (2002). Introduction to the Symposium on Eva Kittay's Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. Hypatia 17 (3):194-199.
Rosemarie Tong (2002). Love's Labor in the Health Care System: Working Toward Gender Equity. Hypatia 17 (3):200 - 213.
Sara Ruddick (2002). An Appreciation of Love's Labor. Hypatia 17 (3):214 - 224.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads24 ( #57,791 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?