David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):147-164 (2009)
Abstract Recently, strong arguments have been offered for the inclusion of jus post bellum in just war theory. If this addition is indeed justified, it is plain that, due to the variety in types of post-conflict situation, the content of jus post bellum will necessarily vary. One instance when it looks as if it should become "extended" in its scope, ranging well beyond (for example) issues of "just peace terms," is when occupation of a defeated enemy is necessary. In this situation, this article argues that an engagement by jus post bellum with the morality of post-conflict reconstruction is unavoidable. However, the resulting extension of jus post bellum 's stipulations threatens to generate conflict with another tenet that it would surely wish to endorse with respect to "just occupation," namely, that sovereignty or self-determination should be restored to the occupied people as soon as is reasonably possible. Hence, the action-guiding objective of the theory could become significantly problematized. The article concludes by considering whether this problem supports the claim that the addition of jus post bellum to just war theory is actually more problematic than its supporters have realized.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Endre Begby, Gregory M. Reichberg & Henrik Syse (2012). The Ethics of War. Part II: Contemporary Authors and Issues. Philosophy Compass 7 (5):328-347.
George M. Clifford (2012). Jus Post Bellum: Foundational Principles and a Proposed Model. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):42-57.
Similar books and articles
Ted van Baarda & Désirée Verweij (eds.) (2009). The Moral Dimension of Asymmetrical Warfare: Counter-Terrorism, Democratic Values and Military Ethics. Martinus Nijhoff.
Mark Evans & Christine Stender (2009). When the Guns Fall Silent : Towards an Adequate Theory of Jus Post Bellum. In International Journal of Ethics. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 65-86.
Annalisa Koeman (2007). A Realistic and Effective Constraint on the Resort to Force? Pre-Commitment to Jus in Bello and Jus Post Bellum as Part of the Criterion of Right Intention. Journal of Military Ethics 6 (3):198-220.
Douglas Lackey (2010). Post War Environmental Damage : A Study in Jus Post Bellum. In Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.), International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
Sigal Ben-Porath (2008). Care Ethics and Dependence— Rethinking Jus Post Bellum. Hypatia 23 (2):pp. 61-71.
Larry May (2012). After War Ends: A Philosophical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Patterson (2010). Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.
Manuela Melandri (2011). The State, Human Rights and the Ethics of War Termination: What Should a Just Peace Look Like? A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249.
Brian Orend (2004). Kant's Ethics of War and Peace. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Added to index2009-06-25
Total downloads84 ( #50,360 of 1,907,353 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,442 of 1,907,353 )
How can I increase my downloads?