|Abstract||In this paper we explore the practice of interdisciplinarity by examining how the UK research councils addressed the problem of the sustainable city during the 1990s. In developing their research programmes, the councils recognised that the problems of the sustainable city transcended conventional disciplinary boundaries and that an interdisciplinary approach was needed. In practice, however, initially radical proposals to research the city as a complex combination of science and technology and society contracted into more cognate collaborations that emphasised either science or technology or society, with the result that interdisciplinarity came to be located within research councils rather than between them. This, in turn, led to the development of a third kind of interdisciplinarity as the responsibility for making the connections between the research programmes was outsourced to the user communities—the local authorities. Unfortunately, local authorities struggled to find the resources to conduct this work so that the radical interdisciplinarity recommended at the start of the decade remained unaccomplished at the end. In describing these events we emphasise roles of paradigms and epistemic cultures in shaping research approaches and the complications they raise for the triangulation between approaches that is assumed in the idea of interdisciplinarity. We do not wish to be entirely negative, however, and conclude by suggesting some ways in which the quality and success of this much-needed interdisciplinary work could be increased|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.) (2010/2012). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OUP Oxford.
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
Erika Mattila (2005). Interdisciplinarity "in the Making": Modeling Infectious Diseases. Perspectives on Science 13 (4):531-553.
J. T. Klein (forthcoming). A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science. Practising Interdisciplinarity:3--24.
Bart van Klink & Sanne Taekema, A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research Into Law.
Jan Schmidt (2011). What is a Problem? Poiesis and Praxis 7 (4):249-274.
David Alvargonzález (2011). Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):387-403.
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2006). Interdisciplinarity and Peirce's Classification of the Sciences: A Centennial Reassessment. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):127-152.
Jan C. Schmidt (2007). Towards a Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity. Poiesis and Praxis 5 (1):53-69.
Michael McDonald (1997). Business Ethics in Canada: Integration and Interdisciplinarity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (6):635-643.
J. Evans & S. Randalls, Geography and Paratactical Interdisciplinarity: Views From the ESRC-NERC PhD Studentship Programme.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Ana S. Iltis (2006). Look Who's Talking: The Interdisciplinarity of Bioethics and the Implications for Bioethics Education. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):629 – 641.
Added to index2011-01-29
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?