Graduate studies at Western
Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):470-485 (1990)
|Abstract||If we assume that Christian faith involves a propositional component whose content is historical, then the question arises as to whether Christian faith must be based on historical evidence, at least in part. One of Kierkegaard’s pseudonyms, Johannes Climacus, argues in Philosophical Fragments that though faith does indeed have such an historical component, it does not depend on evidence, but rather on a first-hand experience of Jesus for which historical records serve only as an occasion. I argue that Climacus’ accountis coherent, and that on such a view historical evidence is not sufficient for faith for anyone. However, in contrast to Climacus, I argue that evidence might still be valuable and even necessary for some people. The resulting danger that the decision about faith might become a question for scholarship is best met, not by insulating faith from historical scholarship, but by recognizing the ability of faith to supply a context in which the evidence available is sufficient|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Keith E. Yandell (1990). The Nature of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):451-469.
Sebastian Rehnman (2011). Graced Response: John Owen on Faith and Reason. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4).
Stephen Law (2011). Evidence, Miracles, and the Existence of Jesus. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):129-151.
A. Harvevany (forthcoming). The Ethics of Belief and Two Conceptions of Christian Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Van A. Harvey (2008). The Ethics of Belief and Two Conceptions of Christian Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1/3):39 - 54.
Daniel J. Mckaughan (2013). Authentic Faith and Acknowledged Risk: Dissolving the Problem of Faith and Reason. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 49 (1):101-124.
Patrick L. Bourgeois (2002). Critical Philosophy and Post-Critical Faith. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):431-450.
Lara Buchak (2012). Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? In Jacob Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2005). Can Faith Be a Doxastic Venture? Religious Studies 41 (4):435-445.
Stephen N. Dunning (1995). Love Is Not Enough. Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):22-39.
Leon J. Goldstein (1962). Evidence and Events in History. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):175-194.
Phillip L. Quinn (1990). Saving Faith From Kant's Remarkable Antimony. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):418-433.
Robert J. Hartman (2011). Involuntary Belief and the Command to Have Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):181-192.
C. Stephen Evans (1994). Critical Historical Judgement and Biblical Faith. Faith and Philosophy 11 (2):184-206.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?