Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 123 (2):263-278 (2000)
|Abstract||I provide an intuitive, semantic account of a new logic forcomparisons (CL), in which atomic statements are assigned both aclassical truth-value and a ``how much'''' value or extension in the range [0, 1]. The truth-value of each comparison is determinedby the extensions of its component sentences; the truth-value ofeach atomic depends on whether its extension matches a separatestandard for its predicate; everything else is computed classically. CL is less radical than Casari''s comparative logics, in that it does not allow for the formation of comparative statements out of truth-functional molecules. I argue that CL provides a betteranalysis of comparisons and predicate vagueness than classicallogic, fuzzy logic or supervaluation theory. CL provides a modelfor descriptions of the world in terms of comparisons only. Thesorites paradox can be solved by the elimination of atomic sentences.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Petr Hájek (2009). On Vagueness, Truth Values and Fuzzy Logics. Studia Logica 91 (3):367-382.
Christian Fermüller (2010). Review: Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Logic 9:1-9.
Bertil RolF (1982). Russell's Theses on Vagueness. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):69-83.
Kevin C. Klement, Propositional Logic. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hannes Leitgeb (2005). What Truth Depends On. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (2):155-192.
Greg Restall (2005). Logic: An Introduction. Routledge.
Petr Hájek (2001). Fuzzy Logic and Arithmetical Hierarchy III. Studia Logica 68 (1):129-142.
D. Hyde (1997). From Heaps and Gaps to Heaps of Gluts. Mind 106 (424):641-660.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,621 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?