David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Working from a unique background in both archaeology and philosophy, R.G. Collingwood undertook to revise historiography by redefining the concept of evidence. Historians through the modern period, in their willingness to emulate the natural sciences, had absorbed a brand of empiricism which was not only compromising historical thinking but also frustrating the service which history, ideally, should provide for enlightening human experience. What comes of his project is a concept of evidence which may be described as a priori
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Serge Grigoriev (2008). Continuity of the Rational: Naturalism and Historical Understanding in Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):119-137.
David Boucher (1989). The Social and Political Thought of R.G. Collingwood. Cambridge University Press.
R. G. Collingwood (1993). The Idea of History. Oxford University Press.
R. G. Collingwood (1993). The Idea of History. Revised Edition. Oxford University Press.
Kenneth B. McIntyre (2008). Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood's Influence on Skinner and Gadamer. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):138-166.
David Boucher (1993). Human Conduct, History, and Social Science in the Works of R. G. Collingwood and Michael Oakeshott. New Literary History 24:697-717.
Raymun Festin (2005). At the Crossroads of Historiography and Metaphysics of History. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):35-47.
Dimitrios Vardoulakis (2004). The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer's Criticism of Collingwood. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
P. Gardiner (1952). The 'Object' of Historical Knowledge. Philosophy 27 (102):211-220.
Robert M. Burns (2006). Collingwood, Bradley, and Historical Knowledge. History and Theory 45 (2):178–203.
R. Flenley (1947). Collingwood's Idea of History. Canadian Historical Review 27:68-72.
S. K. Wertz (1982). Is Hume's Use of Evidence as Bad as Norton Says It Is? Philosophical Topics 13 (Supplement):79-86.
John Luckman (1991). Metaphysics, History and the Unpublished Manuscripts. International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):27-45.
Stephen Leach (2011). History, Ethics and Philosophy: Bernard Williams Appraisal of R. G. Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):36-53.
Added to index2010-09-10
Total downloads6 ( #202,094 of 1,099,016 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,795 of 1,099,016 )
How can I increase my downloads?