Environmental ethics, animal welfarism, and the problem of predation: A bambi lover's respect for nature
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):42-67 (2001)
: Many environmentalists criticize as unecological the emphasis that animal liberationists and animal rights theorists place on preventing animal suffering. The strong form of their objection holds that both theories ab-surdly entail a duty to intervene in wild predation. The weak form holds that animal welfarists must at least regard predation as bad, and that this stance reflects an arrogance toward nature that true environmentalists should reject. This paper disputes both versions of the predation critique. Animal welfarists are not committed to protecting the rabbit from the fox, nor do their principles implicitly deprecate nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Paul W. Taylor (2011). Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton University Press.
Tom Regan (2009). The Case for Animal Rights. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press 425-434.
Holmes Rolston (1990). [Book Review] Environmental Ethics, Duties to and Values in the Natural World. [REVIEW] Ethics 100:195-197.
Dale Jamieson (1998). Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic. Environmental Values 7 (1):41 - 57.
Dale Jamieson (1990). Rights, Justice, and Duties to Provde Assistance: A Critique of Regan's Theory of Rights. Ethics 100 (2):349-362.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Shapiro (2006). Moral Agency in Other Animals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Josh Milburn (2015). Rabbits, Stoats and the Predator Problem: Why a Strong Animal Rights Position Need Not Call for Human Intervention to Protect Prey From Predators. Res Publica 21 (3):273-289.
David Fraser (2012). A “Practical” Ethic for Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):721-746.
T. J. Kasperbauer (2013). Nussbaum and the Capacities of Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (5):977-997.
Similar books and articles
Gary E. Varner (1998). In Nature's Interests?: Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Michael J. Murray (2008). Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Oxford University Press.
Paul Veatch Moriarty & Mark Woods (1997). Hunting ≠ Predation. Environmental Ethics 19 (4):391-404.
Kirsten Schmidt (2011). Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Roger J. H. King (1991). Environmental Ethics and the Case for Hunting. Environmental Ethics 13 (1):59-85.
L. W. Sumner (1988). Animal Welfare and Animal Rights. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):159-175.
Ty Raterman (2008). An Environmentalist's Lament on Predation. Environmental Ethics 30 (4):417-434.
Ned Hettinger (2010). Animal Beauty, Ethics, and Environmental Preservation. Environmental Ethics 32 (2):115-134.
Ned Hettinger (1994). Valuing Predation in Rolston's Environmental Ethics: Bambi Lovers Versus Tree Huggers. Environmental Ethics 16 (1):3-20.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #92,428 of 1,792,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #139,170 of 1,792,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?