God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, by William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong [Book Review]

Ars Disputandi 4 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

God?: a debate between a Christian and an atheist.William Lane Craig - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
Is Ethical Naturalism more Plausible than Supernaturalism? A Reply to Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.Matthew Flannagan - 2012 - Philo 15 (1):19-37.
Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?: A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics.Louise Antony, William Lane Craig, John Hare, Donald C. Hubin, Paul Kurtz, C. Stephen Layman, Mark C. Murphy, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Richard Swinburne - 2008 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. [REVIEW]Christian Miller - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Volume 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development. [REVIEW]Christian Miller - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Non-Inferential Moral Knowledge.Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):355-366.
Sinnott–Armstrong's moral scepticism.Mark T. Nelson - 2003 - Ratio 16 (1):63–82.
Albert A. Anderson, Steven V. Hicks, and Lech Witkowski, eds., Mythos and Logos. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004, 268 pp.(indexed). ISBN 90-420-1020, $73.00 (pb). Kevin Bales, Disposable People. Berkley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2004, 298 pp.(indexed). ISBN 0-520-24384-6, $17.95 (pb). [REVIEW]Mark Coeckelbergh, Mark T. Conard, Aeon J. Skoble, William Lane Craig & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39:139-141.
Problems for Sinnott-Armstrong's moral contrastivism.Peter Baumann - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):463–470.
‘Nice soft facts’: Fischer on foreknowledge: William Lane Craig.William Lane Craig - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (2):235-246.
A philosophical and historical analysis of William Lane Craig's resurrection of Jesus argument.Raphael Lataster - 2015 - Think 14 (39):59-71.
Anti-Molinist Argument.William Lane Craig - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk (ed.), Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford University Press.
Christian Origins and the Question of God, vol. 3. [REVIEW]William Lane Craig - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (2):239-245.
Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?: A Debate on Faith, Secularism, and Ethics.Robert K. Garcia & Nathan L. King (eds.) - 2008 - Rowman & Littlefield.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references