Erkenntnis 71 (2):191 - 203 (2009)
|Abstract||I argue for the existence of intrinsic Finks, Masks, and Mimics, and argue that these undermine certain recent attempts to revive simple conditional analyses of dispositions. I present some examples of intrinsic Finks, Masks, and Mimics, and argue that the example of an intrinsic fink I present has certain advantages over the examples of intrinsic finks recently suggested by Randolph Clarke. I conclude that the existence of such Finks, Masks, and Mimics, undermine a recent attempt by Sungho Choi to distinguish dispositional properties from categorical properties.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander Bird (2004). Antidotes All the Way Down? Theoria 19 (3):259-269.
Alexander Bird (2004). Antidotes All the Way Down? Theoria 19 (3):259–69.
A. Bird & T. Handfield (2008). Dispositions, Rules and Finks. Philosophical Studies 140:285-98.
Randolph Clarke (2010). Opposing Powers. Philosophical Studies 149 (2).
David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (2008). On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals. Mind 117 (465):59-84.
Toby Handfield & Alexander Bird (2008). Dispositions, Rules, and Finks. Philosophical Studies 140 (2):285 - 298.
Sungho Choi (2011). Intrinsic Finks and Dispositional/Categorical Distinction. Noûs 46 (2):289-325.
Randolph Clarke (2008). Intrinsic Finks. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):512–518.
Toby Handfield (2008). Unfinkable Dispositions. Synthese 160 (2):297 - 308.
Lauren Ashwell (2010). Superficial Dispositionalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):635-653.
Added to index2009-03-23
Total downloads67 ( #13,279 of 549,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?