Language can help us think. Really.: Reply to Jan Nuyts

Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):408-410 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language is an instrument for thought. Really?Jan Nuyts - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):317-333.
'If 2 = 3, then 2 + 1 = 3 + 1': Reply to heylen and Horsten.E. J. Lowe - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):528-531.
Reply to Ripstein.Jan Narveson - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (2):299-.
Reply to Dworkin.Jan Narveson - 1983 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1):41.
Reply to Claes G. Ryn.Jan Olof Bengtsson - 2008 - The Pluralist 3 (2):15 - 26.
Reply to Phillip Ferreira.Jan Olof Bengtsson - 2008 - The Pluralist 3 (2):47 - 61.
Reply to Christopher Hoyt.Jan Olof Bengtsson - 2008 - The Pluralist 3 (2):71 - 80.
Reply to James McLachlan.Jan Olof Bengtsson - 2008 - The Pluralist 3 (2):100 - 112.
Reply to Randall E. Auxier.Jan Olof Bengtsson - 2008 - The Pluralist 3 (2):128 - 137.
What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language?: Reply to Collins.Barry C. Smith - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
That oldā€time religion: Reply to Herzog.Jan Narveson - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (4):573-582.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-19

Downloads
21 (#700,240)

6 months
8 (#303,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references