Constitution and qua objects in the ontology of music
British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):203-217 (2009)
| Abstract | Musical Platonists identify musical works with abstract sound structures but this implies that they are not created but only discovered. Jerrold Levinson adapts Platonism to allow for creation by identifying musical works with indicated sound structures. In this paper I explore the similarities between Levinson’s view and Kit Fine’s theory of qua objects. Fine offers the theory of qua objects as an account of.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Joel Krueger (forthcoming). Enacting Musical Content. In Riccardo Manzotti (ed.), Situated Aesthetics: Art Beyond the Skin. Imprint Academic.
Andrew Kania (2008). Piece for the End of Time: In Defence of Musical Ontology. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):65-79.
Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson (2004). Can a Musical Work Be Created? British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):113-134.
James Young (2011). The Ontology of Musical Works: A Philosophical Pseudo-Problem. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):284-297.
Jerrold Levinson (1997). Music in the Moment. Cornell University Press.
S. French & P. Vickers (2011). Are There No Things That Are Scientific Theories? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):771-804.
Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson (2006). Defending Musical Perdurantism. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):59-69.
Ross Cameron (2008). There Are No Things That Are Musical Works. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):295-314.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-07-06Total downloads40 ( #28,852 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,703 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |

