David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
A reply to Sean Liam Kelly's analysis of Martial 7.35 in the Fall 1993 issue of Nexus. Although I am in substantial agreement with many parts of Kelly's analysis, one detail of the text which he did not pick up on leads me to offer a different route to Kelly's conclusion that, according to the narrator of the poem, Laecania insults his and his slave's virility, and that in response to this perceived unmanning, he replies with the charge of lesbianism. However, the route I propose introduces into the itinerary not only issues of gender and violence, but also those of race
|Keywords||Martial Gender Race|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Benjamin L. Curtis (2008). Non-Therapeutic Modification and Self-Interest: Reply to Schramme. Bioethics 22 (8):455-456.
Ian Maitland (2002). The Human Face of Self-Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 38 (1-2):3 - 17.
N. Craig Smith (2001). Ethical Guidelines for Marketing Practice: A Reply to Gaski & Some Observations on the Role of Normative Marketing Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (1):3 - 18.
David J. Hess (2011). Bourdieu and Science Studies: Toward a Reflexive Sociology. [REVIEW] Minerva 49 (3):333-348.
Steve F. Sapontzis (1982). The Moral Significance of Interests. Environmental Ethics 4 (4):345-358.
D. Roderick Kiewiet & Michael S. Lewis-Beck (2011). No Man is an Island: Self-Interest, the Public Interest, and Sociotropic Voting. Critical Review 23 (3):303-319.
Elizabeth S. Anderson, Why Commercial Surrogate Motherhood Unethically Commodifies Women and Children: Reply to McLachlan and Swales. [REVIEW]
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2011). Agents and Acacias: Replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
Delia Graff Fara (2008). Profiling Interest Relativity. Analysis 68 (4):326-335.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #85,628 of 1,932,543 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,140 of 1,932,543 )
How can I increase my downloads?