Graduate studies at Western
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2) (1984)
|Abstract||There is a classic problem which confronts any attempt to assign death a value. On the assumption that death is personal annihilation, death deprives evil of a requisite subject, for no misfortune can befall something which does not exist. Recent efforts to provide a reasonable basis for counting death as a bad thing have centered on an analysis of the loss of life's goods which it brings. So long as the analysis assumes that death is a simple state, loss can be explained only by reference to a realm of possible things which exist after death. An alternative analysis of death is offered in which death is defined as a limit on life. That analysis provides a basis for evaluative judgements about death, while avoiding any commitment to post-mortem existence.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edith Wyschogrod (1973). The Phenomenon of Death. New York,Harper & Row.
John Martin Fischer (ed.) (1993). The Metaphysics of Death. Stanford University Press.
Fred Feldman (1992). Confrontations with the Reaper: A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death. Oxford University Press.
Ben Bradley (2007). How Bad is Death? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):111-127.
Ireneusz Ziemiński (2007). Death is Not an Event in Life: Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Transcendental Idealist. Idealistic Studies 37 (1):51-66.
Ari Joffe (2010). Are Recent Defences of the Brain Death Concept Adequate? Bioethics 24 (2):47-53.
Shelly Kagan (2012). Death. Yale University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #38,062 of 732,212 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,212 )
How can I increase my downloads?